31 October, 2019

Very happy with the news ❤️❤️



The upcoming Chief Justice of India, Justice Bobde said in an interview that Judges too get bothered by criticism on social media and people commenting on a case, by personally attacking the judge and raising questions on his personal identity is excessive use of free speech.
I’m glad it’s time, someone actually realised this and I really hope the courts should realise super soon how strongly media plays a role in triggering these personal attacks & mockery 🙏
If anyone also remembers in 2017, we saw a news headline of The Hindu that said ‘Women sandals without straps are not slippers - rules Delhi High Court’
This lead to the entire Twitter erupting and people attacking & mocking the court for spending time on deciding what is a sandal by numerous dumbwits who did not even read the case, because if they’d read they’d know that it was a matter of tax, which is different for different type of footwear and the court was deciding if the petitioner was being taxed for something else while he was manufacturing something else.
BUT the Court was made fun of, because The Hindu decided to induce in a clickbait in a court case.
Media houses have developed a new trend, first spread misinformation on social media and then delete it.
Even really tiny websites like The Frustrated Indian once wrote that the Nobel Laureate Abhijit Banerjee, who recently criticised the government policies, in 2012 wrote an article in The Hindu, in an attempt to justify the Nirbhaya Case.
First, they got it circulated, tried to tarnish his image and then later deleted it when someone certain pointed out that Abhijit’s article was posted 2 months before the Nirbhaya Case even happened.

I earnestly pray, that in near future the court stricts the liability of media houses and start slapping fines for inducing clickbaits, unnecessary outrage porn, and spreading misinformation in the matter of law, court and cases ❤️

09 October, 2019

Ravana : The Women Right’s Activist


Every year on Dusshera and Rakshabandhan a few people praise Ravana, for he never touched Sita and waited for her consent (which he never got cuz lord Ram popped an arrow in his naval) and say things like a brother should be like Ravana who fought for his sister with even Gods.
Let me break it down :
- In viavat puraan, Surpanakha was married to Dushtabuddhi, an Asur in the court of Ravana.
Ravana killed him and made her a widow.

In another version she secretly married, Vidhyutjihva, a Danav from hell.
Ravana killed him and made her a widow here too.

-Hence, Surpnakha always wanted to kill Ravana after this. When she met Ram & Laxman and Laxman chopped her nose, Ravana wasn’t the brother she went to, she went to Khar & Dushan. They first sent some demons thinking Ram to be an ordinary human. Its when they all got killed, Khar himself went with his entire army and got everyone killed except Akampan, who was left alive purposely.
Meanwhile, Surpnakha realised that it was Ram who killed Tadka (her grandmother), Khar & Dushan (her brothers) and Subahu (her uncle) and he was definitely someone who could kill Ravana too.
So she nicely went and told Ravana about Sita and how she would be a perfect wife for him, and as she plotted, he got killed.
What a PERFECT BROTHER-SISTER relationship !? Yay !?

Coming to respecting women :
In Uttarakhand, Ravana raped Apsara Rambha, the daughter-in-law of his own brother Kuber. Kuber’s son Nalkuber cursed Ravana that the next time he touches a woman without her consent, his head will explode.
In Gunabhadra’s uttara puraan, Ravana again sexually assaults Manivati. Manivati swears that she will take revenge, and guess what she was reborn as Sita.
Ravana ALSO tried to rape Vedavati, grand daughter of Brihaspati. Vedavati immolated herself in fire and promised that she will be born again to cause Ravana’s destruction. She again, is said to have reborn as Sita.

P.S : had he been born today, he could have started kidnapping children keeping them locked at his palace and people would have called it a Childcare Centre.

Hope next time before praising Ravana for his buddhimanta people revisit our Vedic puraan 🙏

02 October, 2019

Apocalypse - and the remains!

Does anyone remember, in the trailer of X Men Apocalypse, Apocalypse says that it has been called many names ‘Ra, Krishna, Yahweh’.
Later, a hindu group took offence of this for comparing a villain to Krishna, and a Jewish group took the same offence for Yahweh.
To bury the controversy, the statement was changed and in the movie he says, ‘Elohim, Shen, Ra’
The names Krishna and Yahweh were changed but not Ra. The reason being, there is no one left to take offence for the name Ra.
Ra is the ancient Egyptian sun god. People of the great Egypt, who had glorious history and mythology, don’t exist anymore. The Egyptian empire of Egypt is now ‘Arab Republic of Egypt’.
It blatantly proves how an entire culture got wiped out of the world due to external forces, and its pretty possible for it to happen in any era, no matter how deeply rooted, old and rich the culture maybe.
The ancient Egyptian culture is the same culture which built The Sphinx, The pyramids. The only leftovers of it that remains in this era are The Mummies, the reference of which we see in the horror movies.
There was a time when cultures used to hold empires together, they maintained a stability due to an identity that they provided, however today the modern day people hold a culture like a shackle instead of a bond, and they keep forgetting that the idea that a man can exist independent of any culture has already been found impossible.
A man will always be under the influence of a culture, society and culture mutually rise and fall. Its therefore his choice to choose whether he wants to live in his own culture or someone else’s.